I went to an affluent high school much like Manheim (Although many of the students were extremely wealthy, I (and most of my friends) sat comfortably in middle class). I don't know if I was oblivious or it wasn't going on, but I don't recall any of the students being as blatant in their disregard for their grades. I struggle to understand how these kids can (seemingly thoughtlessly) fail the majority of their classes or repeat entire grades. The most frustrating aspect of this is that a good deal of the kids I see failing are extremely intelligent and could easily ace every class if they bothered to put in even a minuscule amount of effort. Which brings me to....
Are they actually bored? I feel like any time an intelligent kid fails, educators slap a "not challenged enough" or "bored" label on them. I don't know if I agree with this idea. I think it's something else, or at least a combination of boredom and something else. (Sorry this is so inarticulate - I'm having trouble saying what I want to say.) Basically, what I'm trying to suggest is that boredom is not the sole reason these bright kids are failing consistently.
These kids come and sit in our classrooms and we see one small dimension of who they are. I think we need to realize and plan for the fact that who we see them as for 40 minutes of their day, doesn't do them justice. I've talked about this with friends I've had classes with for years, who I only began talking to/getting to know this school year -until you take the time to get to know someone, you forget they exist in a world beyond the one you see them in. It's like that surreal moment when you realize your parents aren't JUST your parents. They're someone's kid, someone's spouse, someone's EX, someone's best friend etc. These kids aren't JUST our English students: some of them are athletes, some have problems at home, some are helping pay the rent, some didn't eat dinner last night, some just broke up with their boyfriend/girlfriend, some are sick, some are frustrated, some are depressed, some are addicted to drugs/alcohol, some are homecoming queens, some are last-picked in gym, some are in bands, some are desperate for attention, some are trying to avoid it, etc. etc. etc.
Sorry this is long and rambling - it's a bit stream-of-consciousness. What I'm trying to say, at the end of all this, is that until we take the time (though it might be a long and difficult process) to know who these kids REALLY are, outside of the classroom, we will never be able to help them IN the classroom.
Whew!
I am more convinced each day that it's the presentation that turns kids off. I see the difference in their attention when a lesson is engaging and relevant to them. My co-op had a lesson on Friday that wowed me and the students and it was so cool to see their reaction and interest. Bureaucracy gets in the way of this being the norm. When do we say "enough is enough?"
ReplyDeleteI agree, it must be more than boredom that keeps students from being engaged. Today my co-op and I were showing the students different sites that they could use for their final projects on Catcher in the Rye. Most of these sites came from suggestions that Ollie gave us. As I went through the different sites and the various ways they could be creative and innovative I glanced around the room and was met with dead stares. When I asked if anyone would be interested in utilizing any of these sites I barely got any response. I don't really get it. If I was offered these choices when I was in high school I would have been ecstatic. It may be because we are just starting the unit and the students haven't had a lot of time to get involved in the text yet (I hope that's what it is) but it was depressing to see the students take barely any interest in the freedom we are letting them have for their next assessment.
ReplyDelete