Sunday, October 23, 2011

"Well that sounds good in theory..."

I am continually amazed by the belief that philosophies of education can be sound in theory but no in practice. I suppose there are some instances where this comes into play, but for the most part I see this school of thought as the biggest cop out among teachers. It's as if they've stumbled upon this great loop hole that allows them to keep doing things the wrong way. Be it out of habit, laziness, fear or stubbornness, I see this happening all the time. Take my co-op for instance; he's a great guy and his heart really is in the right place in a lot of ways, but his famous line since day one has been "that sounds good, but I don't think eighth graders can handle that." Whether he believes that or not, he uses that line regarding writing/reading workshops, writers notebooks, discussions and so many other tactics that I would not dream of keeping out of my classroom. My big thing has been quizzes. Everything they do is quizzed. They read a short story, they get a study guide, they go over the answers for a couple days, then they take a quiz that pretty much mirrors that study guide. There is just no critical thinking and no real life connections. It's all plot summary and author facts. So for my RPG i asked if i could run a class discussion about The Hunger Games, a book that the students are literally eating up. Almost 3/4 of the kids finished before the lesson plans called for it and of those kids I'd say over 1/2 are already reading the second. It's sooooooo awesome to watch these kids absolutely lose themselves in a book. Yet despite all this passion the only thing they do with it is quizes and worksheets. So what i did was Friday I set the desks up in a circle. Each person received an article as they entered the class on the topic of reality TV and culture (there were three different articles ranging in viewpoint dispersed through the class). Finally I shared the lyrics of the song "The Cave" by Mumford and Sons because the themes in the song, as well as the title, are major themes in the book. And 40 minutes we talked. Naturally because they were new to this I had to lead them more than I was used too, but they were into it. They loved uncovering the fact that just as the government in the book shows people only what they want them to see, the reality shows they watch weekly do the same. We also talked a lot about identity and how, much like characters in the book and on survivor act differently on the show and create false identities based upon perceptions, we too act differently depending on our surroundings. They got it, and they loved it. Every discussion was different, and unique to that class, yet all were on point and all of them were interrupted by the bell, leaving hands in the air and kids saying "awww I had something to say."

Here's why this was awesome. Just like characters in The Hunger Games and Reality TV shows become victims of their surroundings, I can sometimes feel myself being pulled one way or another because of the climate I see in the schools. A lot of teachers have this notion that kids can only handle a certain level of thinking, so "why bother pushing them?" And when your around that so much you kind of forget how important all these "idealistic" philosophies are that we talk about at Millersville. Friday I saw a lot of light bulbs going on above students head. They all love the book, but now they get it on a whole new level. They understand why were teaching it and how it effects their life, and thats powerful stuff. I needed to see that. To be reminded that the theories we discuss in class are so much better in practice. I don't think the atmosphere in schools is ever truly going to change, which means the pressure is always going to be on to take the easy way out; however, if 75 8th graders can have an organized discussion over social connections to The Hunger Games, then we have more than theory, we have pedagogy.

4 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you Spencer! Ditto here. When I get to do this kind of deep thinking, it's seen as ancillary; the "real" work is the quiz, worksheet or prescriptive paragraph. My kids didn't understand Light in the Forest because the terms "third person omniscient" and "internal/external conflict" were tripping them up. When I used Jeff Wilhelm's ideas from "Fresh Takes..." and expanded the notion of Point of View, they came to life and realized that they understood the book! But what I did with them was not considered to be officially part of the coverage. Same with my teaching of Milkweed; I was reminded that I had to have some more traditional things to grade. The fact that the kids love reading the book and we stop and have probing discussions does not count for real "school" work. Don't even mention grammar...the subject is not always a noun and the first verb one sees in a sentence is not always the predicate! Example: The man who was walking his dog is my brother. Running is my favorite sport. Oy-Vay!! Spenser, I promised I'd never give voice to these observations again, but you touched a nerve buddy!

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's interesting you bring this up. One of the first community meetings I attended with my co-op, a couple of the teachers were complaining about something they said their students "just couldn't handle." It lasted about 2 minutes until the interim principal spoke up and basically told them to stop expecting so little from the kids because that's what the kids will give them right back. Whenever I take the lead in my class, I try to push the students beyond their abilities because a lot of them are a lot smarter than they give themselves credit for.

    Regarding your discussion, I've been trying to think of ways to teach the two novels to my students (the honors class will be reading "A Wizard of Earthsea" and the lower level students will be reading "Esperanza Rising"). I was looking for ways to avoid the quizzes even though they seem inevitable, especially when it comes to vocabulary. This post just made me rethink every idea I had with the novels and incorporate discussions and connections to the texts. Luckily, my co-op despises quizzes and has only given one since the beginning of the year, so I don't think I'll have trouble incorporating your "round table" discussion into a lesson. Thanks for the post/idea!

    ReplyDelete
  4. While I completely agree with you Spencer, I think that it is imperative to remember that importance of assessment scores in our society. I think quizzes aren't the root of all evil. Take my co-op for example, he uses quizzes every so often as a means of assessment. However, he also has writer's binders and other creative projects intertwined in his lessons to see how far along the students are coming.

    One thing is for sure, I am completely behind anyone who pushes the boundaries of our students. However, I also completely agree that after listening to some of our classmates at MU talk... At times, I think we tend to get caught up in the possibilities and lose focus on the practicalities. It's easy to live in the clouds but it's also just as easy to lose sight of the age group we are dealing with.

    I don't resent anyone who uses old school methodologies... though I do sometimes feel bad for how archaic they are. However, I also find it to be quite the humbling experience for me because I learn more about the craft of teaching.

    Some things have worked over time for a reason... it's because they are effective. Obviously, there are some broken things that need fixed too. It's all part of the juggling act that is teaching, I guess.

    I don't mean to rain on everyone's parade. I'm as progressive as the next person. But sometimes I feel that practicality gets lost in these discussions.

    ReplyDelete